Skip to main content
Use these prompts to organize public-company disclosures into reviewable research work product. They are designed to preserve the record that supports a question, not to provide legal advice, establish completeness, or reach a legal conclusion.
filings.search and sections.search do not apply an MCP date window. Retrieve candidate records first, then filter their returned filingDate before selecting sections or exports.

Before you run a prompt

Connect a supported client through MCP installation, then give it an API key from the environment or secret store that actually runs the client. Do not paste a key into the prompt. Start with one issuer and one prompt. A useful first result names the form, filing date, accession number, section or fact reference, source URL, and request ID when returned. These prompts prepare research work product; they do not practice law. Preserve the filing record, mark unanswered questions plainly, and stop on auth, validation, billing, quota, or capability errors instead of broadening the request.

Working rules

  • Cite the form, filing date, accession number, section, and source URL for every factual proposition.
  • Use an intelligence or search result to find the record, then retrieve the cited filing section before characterizing it.
  • Label an unanswered question as unanswered. Absence from a search result is not a complete-record determination.

1. Issuer disclosure dossier

Prompt id: law-firm-enforcement-history

2. Material-agreement diligence

Prompt id: law-firm-deal-disclosure-diligence

3. Meeting-vote precedent memo

Prompt id: law-firm-proxy-fight-vote-analysis

4. Amendment and controls queue

Prompt id: law-firm-restatement-detection

5. Filing binder manifest

Prompt id: law-firm-litigation-binder-export

6. Officer-change disclosure monitor

Prompt id: law-firm-officer-departure-monitoring

7. Section 16 research packet

Prompt id: law-firm-insider-trading-pattern-review

8. Peer risk-factor comparison

Prompt id: law-firm-disclosure-comparison-peer

9. Cross-issuer disclosure study

Prompt id: law-firm-regulatory-search-thematic

10. Going-concern disclosure scan

Prompt id: law-firm-going-concern-keyword-scan

11. Financial baseline for expert review

Prompt id: law-firm-defendant-financial-baseline

12. Board disclosure binder

Prompt id: law-firm-d-and-o-binder

Evidence standard

Treat the cited filing and section as the evidence, and re-open the source before relying on a material conclusion. Exported files are research copies, not chain-of-custody certifications.