Use these prompts to organize public-company disclosures into reviewable research work product. They are designed to preserve the record that supports a question, not to provide legal advice, establish completeness, or reach a legal conclusion.
filings.search and sections.search do not apply an MCP date window. Retrieve candidate records first, then filter their returned filingDate before selecting sections or exports.
Before you run a prompt
Connect a supported client through MCP installation, then give it an API key from the environment or secret store that actually runs the client. Do not paste a key into the prompt. Start with one issuer and one prompt. A useful first result names the form, filing date, accession number, section or fact reference, source URL, and request ID when returned.
These prompts prepare research work product; they do not practice law. Preserve the filing record, mark unanswered questions plainly, and stop on auth, validation, billing, quota, or capability errors instead of broadening the request.
Working rules
- Cite the form, filing date, accession number, section, and source URL for every factual proposition.
- Use an intelligence or search result to find the record, then retrieve the cited filing section before characterizing it.
- Label an unanswered question as unanswered. Absence from a search result is not a complete-record determination.
1. Issuer disclosure dossier
Prompt id: law-firm-enforcement-history
2. Material-agreement diligence
Prompt id: law-firm-deal-disclosure-diligence
3. Meeting-vote precedent memo
Prompt id: law-firm-proxy-fight-vote-analysis
4. Amendment and controls queue
Prompt id: law-firm-restatement-detection
5. Filing binder manifest
Prompt id: law-firm-litigation-binder-export
6. Officer-change disclosure monitor
Prompt id: law-firm-officer-departure-monitoring
7. Section 16 research packet
Prompt id: law-firm-insider-trading-pattern-review
8. Peer risk-factor comparison
Prompt id: law-firm-disclosure-comparison-peer
9. Cross-issuer disclosure study
Prompt id: law-firm-regulatory-search-thematic
10. Going-concern disclosure scan
Prompt id: law-firm-going-concern-keyword-scan
11. Financial baseline for expert review
Prompt id: law-firm-defendant-financial-baseline
12. Board disclosure binder
Prompt id: law-firm-d-and-o-binder
Evidence standard
Treat the cited filing and section as the evidence, and re-open the source before relying on a material conclusion. Exported files are research copies, not chain-of-custody certifications.